Skip to main content

Exposures to Banks

No: 44047144 Date(g): 27/12/2022 | Date(h): 4/6/1444 Status: In-Force

Effective from Jan 01 2023 - Dec 31 2022
To view other versions open the versions tab on the right

7.12For the purposes of calculating capital requirements, a bank exposure is defined as a claim (including loans and senior debt instruments, unless considered as subordinated debt for the purposes of paragraph 7.52) on any financial institution that is licensed to take deposits from the public and is subject to appropriate prudential standards and level of supervision5. The treatment associated with subordinated bank debt and equities is addressed in paragraphs 7.46 to 7.52.
 
Risk weight determination 
 
7.13Bank exposures will be risk-weighted based on the following hierarchy:
 
 1.External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA): This approach applies to all rated exposures to banks. Banks will apply chapter 8 to determine which rating can be used and for which exposures.
 
 2.Standardized Credit Risk Assessment Approach (SCRA): This approach is applicable to all exposures to banks that are unrated.
 
External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA) 
 
7.14Banks will assign to their rated bank exposures6 the corresponding “base” risk weights determined by the external ratings according to Table 4. Such ratings must not incorporate assumptions of implicit government support7, unless the rating refers to a public bank owned by its government. Banks may continue to use external ratings, which incorporate assumptions of implicit government support for up to a period of five years, from the date of effective implementation of this framework, when assigning the “base” risk weights in Table 4 to their bank exposures. 
 
Risk weight table for bank exposures 
External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA)Table 4
External rating of counterpartyAAA to AA–A+ to A–BBB+ to BBB–BB+ to B–Below B–
“Base” risk weight20%30%50%100%150%
Risk weight for short-term exposures20%20%20%50%150%
 
7.15Exposures to banks with an original maturity of three months or less, as well as exposures to banks that arise from the movement of goods across national borders with an original maturity of six months or less8 can be assigned a risk weight that correspond to the risk weights for short term exposures in Table 4.
 
7.16Banks must perform due diligence to ensure that the external ratings appropriately and conservatively reflect the creditworthiness of the bank counterparties. If the due diligence analysis reflects higher risk characteristics than that implied by the external rating bucket of the exposure (i.e. AAA to AA– ; A+ to A– etc.), the bank must assign a risk weight at least one bucket higher than the “base” risk weight determined by the external rating. Due diligence analysis must never result in the application of a lower risk weight than that determined by the external rating.
 
Standardized Credit Risk Assessment Approach (SCRA) 
 
7.17Banks will apply the SCRA to all their unrated bank exposures. The SCRA requires banks to classify bank exposures into one of three risk-weight buckets (i.e. Grades A, B and C) and assign the corresponding risk weights in Table 5. Under the SCRA, exposures to banks without an external credit rating may receive a risk weight of 30%, provided that the counterparty bank has a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio which meets or exceeds 14% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio which meets or exceeds 5%. The counterparty bank must also satisfy all the requirements for Grade A classification. For the purposes of SCRA only, “published minimum regulatory requirements” in paragraphs 7.18 to 7.26 excludes liquidity standards.
 
Risk weight table for bank exposures 
Standardized Credit Risk Assessment Approach (SCRA)Table 5
Credit risk assessment of counterpartyGrade AGrade BGrade C
“Base” risk weight40%75%150%
Risk weight for shortterm exposures20%50%150%
 
SCRA: Grade A 
 
7.18Grade A refers to exposures to banks, where the counterparty bank has adequate capacity to meet their financial commitments (including repayments of principal and interest) in a timely manner, for the projected life of the assets or exposures and irrespective of the economic cycles and business conditions.
 
7.19A counterparty bank classified into Grade A must meet or exceed the published minimum regulatory requirements and buffers established by its national supervisor as implemented in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, except for bank-specific minimum regulatory requirements or buffers that may be imposed through supervisory actions (e.g. via the Supervisory Review Process) and not made public. If such minimum regulatory requirements and buffers (other than bank-specific minimum requirements or buffers) are not publicly disclosed or otherwise made available by the counterparty bank, then the counterparty bank must be assessed as Grade B or lower.
 
7.20If as part of its due diligence, a bank assesses that a counterparty bank does not meet the definition of Grade A in paragraphs 7.18 and 7.19, exposures to the counterparty bank must be classified as Grade B or Grade C.
 
SCRA: Grade B 
 
7.21Grade B refers to exposures to banks, where the counterparty bank is subject to substantial credit risk, such as repayment capacities that are dependent on stable or favorable economic or business conditions.
 
7.22A counterparty bank classified into Grade B must meet or exceed the published minimum regulatory requirements (excluding buffers) established by its national supervisor as implemented in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, except for bank-specific minimum regulatory requirements that may be imposed through supervisory actions (e.g. via the Supervisory Review Process) and not made public. If such minimum regulatory requirements are not publicly disclosed or otherwise made available by the counterparty bank then the counterparty bank must be assessed as Grade C.
 
7.23Banks will classify all exposures that do not meet the requirements outlined in paragraphs 7.18 and 7.19 into Grade B, unless the exposure falls within Grade C under paragraphs 7.24 to 7.26.
 
SCRA: Grade C 
 
7.24Grade C refers to higher credit risk exposures to banks, where the counterparty bank has material default risks and limited margins of safety. For these counterparties, adverse business, financial, or economic conditions are very likely to lead, or have led, to an inability to meet their financial commitments.
 
7.25At a minimum, if any of the following triggers is breached, a bank must classify the exposure into Grade C:
 
 1.The counterparty bank does not meet the criteria for being classified as Grade B with respect to its published minimum regulatory requirements, asset out in paragraphs 7.21 and 7.22 or
 
 2.Where audited financial statements are required, the external auditor has issued an adverse audit opinion or has expressed substantial doubt about the counterparty bank’s ability to continue as a going concern in its financial statements or audited reports within the previous 12 months.
 
7.26Even if the triggers set out in paragraph 7.25 are not breached, a bank may assess that the counterparty bank meets the definition in paragraph 7.24. In that case, the exposure to such counterparty bank must be classified into Grade C.
 
7.27Exposures to banks with an original maturity of three months or less, as well as exposures to banks that arise from the movement of goods across national borders with an original maturity of six months or less,9 can be assigned a risk weight that correspond to the risk weights for short term exposures in Table 5.
 
7.28To reflect transfer and convertibility risk under the SCRA, a risk-weight floor based on the risk weight applicable to exposures to the sovereign of the country where the bank counterparty is incorporated will be applied to the risk weight assigned to bank exposures. The sovereign floor applies when:
 
 i.The exposure is not in the local currency of the jurisdiction of incorporation of the debtor bank; and
 
 ii.For a borrowing booked in a branch of the debtor bank in a foreign jurisdiction, when the exposure is not in the local currency of the jurisdiction in which the branch operates. The sovereign floor will not apply to short-term (i.e. with a maturity below one year) self-liquidating, trade-related contingent items that arise from the movement of goods.
 

5 For internationally active banks, appropriate prudential standards (e.g. capital and liquidity requirements) and level of supervision should be in accordance with the Basel framework.
6 An exposure is rated from the perspective of a bank if the exposure is rated by a recognized “eligible credit assessment institution” (ECAI) which has been nominated by the bank (i.e. the bank has informed SAMA of its intention to use the ratings of such ECAI for regulatory purposes in a consistent manner paragraph 8.8 In other words, if an external rating exists but the credit rating agency is not a recognized ECAI by SAMA, or the rating has been issued by an ECAI which has not been nominated by the bank, the exposure would be considered as being unrated from the perspective of the bank
7 Implicit government support refers to the notion that the government would act to prevent bank creditors from incurring losses in the event of a bank default or bank distress.
8 This may include on-balance sheet exposures such as loans and off- balance sheet exposures such as self-liquidating trade-related contingent items.
9 This may include on-balance sheet exposures such as loans and off-balance sheet exposures such as self-liquidating trade-related contingent items.