Skip to main content

6.4 Treatment of Expected Losses and Provisions

Effective from Jun 12 2006 - Jun 11 2006
To view other versions open the versions tab on the right

Bank using the IRB Approach should compare the amount of total eligible provisions with the total EL amount as calculated within the IRB Approach. In addition, where a bank is also subject to the Standardized Approach to credit risk for a portion of its credit exposures, general provisions can be included in a bank supplementary capital subject to the limit of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets.

Where the EL amount exceed the total eligible provision, banks should deduct the difference from the capital base at 50% from Tier-1 and 50% from Tier -II.

Where the calculated EL amount is lower than the provisions of the bank, its supervisors must consider whether the EL fully reflects the conditions in the market in which it operates before allowing the difference to be included in Tier 2 capital. If specific provisions exceed the EL amount on defaulted assets this assessment also needs to be made before using the difference to offset the EL amount on non-defaulted assets.

(Refer para 385, International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – June 2006)

The EL amount for equity exposures under the PD/LGD approach is deducted 50% from Tier 1 and 50% from Tier 2. Provisions or write-offs for equity exposures under the PD/LGD approach will not be used in the EL-provision calculation.

The treatment of EL and provisions related to securitization exposures is outlined in paragraph 563.

(Refer para 386, International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – June 2006)