Skip to main content

4.1.11 Off Balance Sheet Items

No: BCS 290 Date(g): 12/6/2006 | Date(h): 16/5/1427

Effective from Jan 01 2008 - Dec 31 2007
To view other versions open the versions tab on the right

Off-balance-sheet items under the Standardized Approach will be converted into credit exposure equivalents through the use of credit conversion factors (CCF).

Commitments with an original maturity of up to one year and commitments with an original maturity over one year will receive a CCF of 20% and 50%, respectively. However, any commitments that are unconditionally cancelable at any time by the bank without prior notice, or that effectively provide for automatic cancellation due to deterioration in a borrower’s creditworthiness, will receive a 0% CCF.

For short-term self-liquidating trade letters of credit arising from the movement of goods (e.g. documentary credits collateralized by the underlying shipment), a 20% CCF will be applied to both issuing and confirming banks.

Where there is an undertaking to provide a commitment on an off-balance sheet item, banks are to apply the lower of the two applicable CCFs.

CCFs not specified above remain as defined in the 1988 Accord.

The credit equivalent amount of OTC derivatives and SFTs that expose a bank to counterparty credit risk is to be calculated under the rules set forth in Annex 4 of International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, 2006.

(Refer to Paragraph 87 of International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – June 2006).

With regard to unsettled securities, commodities, and foreign exchange transaction, SAMA requires that bank’s prepares its Prudential return submission based on trade date rather than settlement date as per the accounting convention. Banks are encouraged to develop, implement and improve systems for tracking and monitoring the credit risk exposure arising from unsettled transactions as appropriate for producing management information that facilitates action on a timely basis. Furthermore, when such transactions are not processed through a delivery-versus-payment (DvP) or payment-versus-payment (PvP) mechanism, banks must calculate a capital charge as set forth in Annex 3 of International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – June 2006

(Refer to Paragraph 89 of International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – June 2006)