In evaluating the level of premiums paid by banks for their insurance coverage it is useful to use the standard insurance industry metric of “Rate on Line”_ This is simply the . ratio of premium charged to sum insured (i.e. premium charge/sum insured = "Rate on. Line"). Globally, the spread for Rate on Line runs between 1% - 2% for highly preferred risks with excellent loss records and high retention to approximately 10 % for low quality risks with high loss records and low retention.

Therefore, as may be readily seen insurance pricing is designed to insure that underwriters will recapture the cost of all but the most catastrophic (and lowest probability) losses through the premium structure The premiums of conventional insurance programs may be structured in a number of ways:

Guaranteed Cost Programs - The standard approach for determining a bank's insurance premiums is by means of a guaranteed cost rating. most Saudi banks currently use these types of insurance programs. The guaranteed cost plan is intended to pre-fund all losses that are expected to occur during the policy period. This approach applies predetermined rates to an exposure base to determine premiums. The premium is guaranteed in the sense that it will not vary. However, depending on actual loss incurred during the policy period, premiums may be adjusted at renewal to reflect actual exposures which existed during the rating period. Therefore, reserves for losses that have been Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) or paid remain with the insurer and investment income accrues to the insurer and the insured receives no benefit from them. However, if the insured has poor loss experience during the policy period, the insurer has no recourse for these which could far exceed earnings generated from the reserves.

Retrospective Rating Programs - Retrospective rating programs are based on the risk management ability and performance of the bank. For these arrangements which offer the insured the opportunity for substantial cost savings over a guaranteed cost plan if the loss record is good. Consequently, if the loss record is poor, the insured may end up paying more premium to the insurer than under self-insurance. Retrospective rating programs offer a system of rewards and punishments depending upon the effectiveness with which the bank manages its risk. Retrospective programs may involve a variety of methods.

No Claims Bonus - The simplest of the retrospective rating programs is the no claims bonus. Under this type of policy a percentage of the premium is returned to the insured at the end of the policy period if no claims are filed with the insurer.

Incurred Loss Retro- Here, an initial premium is paid at policy inception and is adjusted during subsequent years as actual incurred losses become known - with deposit premium being adjusted upward or downward based on loss experience. Generally, premium adjustments are computed annually and a minimum is established for the protection of the insurer. It is adjusted on the basis of losses that have actually been paid, as opposed to losses that have actually occured which may be more than losses that have been paid. This eases the insured's cash flow problem and allows the use of the loss reserves. The difference Between the standard premium and the amount paid by the insured is normally secured by a Letter of Credit or other acceptable financial guarantee.

Loss Multiplier Plans - Since all retro methods are essentially cost-plus contracts, a simple way to compare retros is by comparing the amount of "load" for non-loss costs on a percentage basis. Dividing the premium by the incurred losses gives an index known as the Effective Loss Multiplier (ELM) - thus a plan with an ELM of l30% is less expensive than plan with an ELM of 150%. Some plans utilize this-concept for determining the premium by simply multiplying the incurred losses by a stated loss multiplier subject to agreed upon minimum and maximum premium levels. This greatly simplifies the calculation process for both insured and insurer.

Present Value Discount Plans- Under these plans, losses are forecasted and then discounted back to present value at some agreed upon interest rate. Insurer expenses are added and a flat premium is charged. This premium is intended to be adequate to cover losses and to avoid the need for adjustments. However, most plans include provisions for eventually adjustment if actual losses are substantially higher or lower than expected.

Fixed_ Cost Participating Dividend Plans - This type of program is really a hybrid between retrospective and guaranteed costs policies as it gives the insurer an option to return a portion or all of the under-writing profits to the participant if it chooses, but generally does no allow the insurer to charge an additional premium for worse than expected losses. While the potential savings are not as great as under a pure retrospective program, the insured is in a no loss position. This is because maximum premium which may be charged is equal to the guaranteed cost premium less any applicable "dividend" discounts granted by the insurer.

Multiline Aggregate Program - Becoming increasingly more attractive as operational risk exposures rise, multi-line aggregate programs use a single insurance policy to cover all of the institution's exposures subject to an aggregate deductible applied to all covered losses. Once the aggregate deductible is satisfied by the payment of one or more claims, the policy would respond to any additional losses upto the aggregate limit. The theory is that by combining the various types of insurable exposures the overall predictability of loss costs is enhanced. An insured may then pay directly for planned and budged loss costs and rely on the multi-line aggregate policy to cover unplanned "high value low probability risk".